So the problems where choosing locally optimal also leads to a global solution are best fit for Greedy. The above idea leads to the Divide-and-Conquer principle. Greedy algorithms have a local choice of the subproblem that will lead to an optimal answer After trying all split points it determines which is unique. Submasalah dibagi lagi dan lagi. For example naive recursive implementation of Fibonacci function has time complexity of O(2^n) where DP solution doing the same with only O(n)time. If in Divide and Conquer algorithm, if we find the overlapping subproblems , then we can apply dynamic programming there and if we apply DAC it solves the same problem again because of which time complexity increases. Submasalah dibagi lagi dan lagi. So, recurrence relation for the above is. Code Challenges. The function compute computes one row $i$ of states dp_cur, given the previous row $i-1$ of states dp_before. Difference between Dynamic Programming and Divide-and-conquer. $opt(i, j) \leq opt(i, j + 1)$ for all $i, j$, then we can apply So, we can memorize these result in an arrayThe idea is to store the fib(n) as it is calculated in a table, For every i, belongs to [1,n], we will calculate fib(i) once. There Say $1 \leq i \leq n$ and $1 \leq j \leq m$, and evaluating $C$ takes $O(1)$ Apa itu Divide and Conquer. irÄ«bu salÄ«dzinājums. The optimal Divide and Conquer 2. So the problems where choosing locally optimal also leads to a global solution are best fit for Greedy. Any term in Fibonacci is the sum of the preceding two numbers. Q2: Compare Greedy vs Divide & Conquer vs Dynamic Programming Algorithms Related To: Dynamic Programming, Greedy Algorithms Add to PDF Senior . Video Tutorial by "Sothe" the Algorithm Wolf. Vad är Dynamic Programming - Definition, Funktionalitet 3. Dynamic Programming Explain the difference between dynamic programming with divide and conquer algorithm and what are the two main steps of dynamic programming algorithm?Construct a table to compute Binomial coefficients with n = 5, k = 5 Some dynamic programming problems have a recurrence of this form: $$dp(i, j) = In computer science, divide and conquer is an algorithm design paradigm based on multi-branched recursion.A divide-and-conquer algorithm works by recursively breaking down a problem into two or more sub-problems of the same or related type, until these become simple enough to be solved directly. Dynamic programming is both a mathematical optimization method and a computer programming method. Then for any $j' < j$ we know that $opt(i, j') \leq opt(i, j)$. Each Padalinti ir užkariauti yra algoritmas, kuris rekursiÅ¡kai suardo problemą į dvi ar daugiau tos pačios ar susijusios tipo sub-problemų, kol jis tampa pakankamai paprastas, kad jį bÅ«tų galima tiesiogiai iÅ¡spręsti. Let us understand this with a Fibonacci Number problem. It is useful to know and understand What is the difference between Divide and Conquer and Dynamic Programming Algorithms? We will discuss two approaches. Dynamic Programming is a technique for solving problems with overlapping subproblems. A Greedy algorithm is an algorithmic paradigm that builds up a solution piece by piece, always choosing the next piece that offers the most obvious and immediate benefit. "while for the other two approaches you will need to use specialised integer programming solvers." Question: Explain the difference between divide-and-conquer techniques, dynamic programming and greedy methods. Ossza meg és hódítsa meg a dinamikus programozást. But I still hope that this article will shed additional light and help in studying such important approaches as dynamic programming and divide-and-conquer. Preconditions. It has to be called with compute(0, n-1, 0, n-1). Dynamic Programming Greedy Method; 1. In divide and conquer, the subproblems are independent of each other. But unlike, divide and conquer, these sub-problems are not solved independently. Kas ir Divide un Conquer. This lets us solve for all states more efficiently. Minimum Sum Partition problem: Given a set of positive integers S, partition the set S into two subsets S1, S2 such that the difference between the sum of elements in S1 and the sum of elements in S2 is minimized. Recurrence equations describing the work done during recursion are only useful for divide and conquer algorithm analysis a. By recursively keeping track of the Like the divide and conquer algorithm, a dynamic programming algorithm simplifies a complex problem by breaking it down into some simple sub-problems. are $n \times m$ states, and $m$ transitions for each state. Greedy Method is also used to get the optimal solution. It extends Divide-and-Conquer problems with two techniques ( memorization and tabulation ) that stores the solutions of sub-problems and re-use whenever necessary. 2. Nyckelbegrepp. Kulcsszavak. Greedy algorithmsaim to make the optimal choice at that given moment. Difference between Divide & conquer and Dynamic programming Divide & Conquer 1. level, each value of $k$ is used at most twice, and there are at most $\log n$ Greedy Algorithm monotonicity of $opt$. splitting points! There are two key attributes that problems have in order for it to be solved using Dynamic Programming. For Example, fib(3) will be calculated for both fib(4) and fib(5). "while for the other two approaches you will need to use specialised integer programming solvers." This known as the monotonicity condition. Apa Perbedaan Antara Divide and Conquer dan Dynamic Programming - Perbandingan Perbedaan Kunci. What is the main difference between divide and conquer and dynamic programming? $\begingroup$ "Dynamic programming is a divide and conquer strategy" -- that's a dangerous and misleading thing to say. "splitting point" for a fixed $i$ increases as $j$ increases. But can we apply Dynamic Programming to it? The difference between Divide and Conquer and Dynamic Programming is: a. In this, we store the result of the sub-problem that is solved once for future re-use. You can also take the example of Merge sort here to know whether Dynamic Programming can be used there or not? 23:35. It extends Divide-and-Conquer problems with two techniques ( memorization and tabulation ) that stores the solutions of sub-problems and re-use whenever necessary. commented Jan 25 smsubham 4 Answers Skirtumas tarp Divide ir Conquer ir Dynamic Programming Apibrėžimas. From the above, you can conclude that divide-and-conquer has overlapping sub-problems and storing the sub-problems are possible and in this way, Dynamic Programming comes into the picture. Divide and Conquer berfungsi dengan membagi masalah menjadi sub-masalah, menaklukkan setiap sub-masalah secara rekursif dan menggabungkan solusi ini. with the Convex Hull trick or vice-versa. Dynamic programming compared to divide and conquer. In this, we divide it down to two subproblems to calculate (n-1)th and (n-2)th Fibonacci numbers and now we add(combine) these results to get our nth Fibonacci number. Differnce Between Divide and conquer and dynamic programming||Design Analysis and Algorithm ... (LCS) - Recursion and Dynamic Programming ... Abdul Bari 227,430 views. This video contains the differences between Divide and Conquer and Dynamic Programming techniques. Jagamine ja vallutamine on algoritm, mis rekursiivselt lõhub probleemi kahe või enama sama või sellega seotud tüübi allprobleemiks, kuni see muutub piisavalt lihtsaks, et seda otseselt lahendada. -- that's plain wrong. False 11. In this blog, we will see the similarities and differences between Dynamic Programming and Divide-and-Conquer approaches. Dynamic programming approach is similar to divide and conquer in breaking down the problem into smaller and yet smaller possible sub-problems. Let $opt(i, j)$ be the value of $k$ that minimizes the above expression. However, the most significant difference between them is that the latter requires overlapping sub-problems, while the former doesn’t need to. If the search ends with the remaining half being empty, the target is not in the array. Dynamic Programming Extension for Divide and Conquer Dynamic programming approach extends divide and conquer approach with two techniques (memoization and tabulation) that both have a purpose … Divide and Conquer is a dynamic programming optimization. Whether the subproblems overlap or not b. Or Divide-and-Conquer on Steroids TL;DR. A Greedy algorithm is an algorithmic paradigm that builds up a solution piece by piece, always choosing the next piece that offers the most obvious and immediate benefit. function. We will use the same relation, but we will now store the results of the problem that we solved. Binary Search Problem that is also known as a half-interval search, is a search algorithm that finds the position of a target value within a sorted array. Question: Explain the difference between divide-and-conquer techniques, dynamic programming and greedy methods. Dynamic programming divide the problem into subparts and then solve the subparts and use the solutions of the subparts to come to a solution.The main difference b/w dynamic programming and divide … Mi a dinamikus programozás - Meghatározás, funkcionalitás 3. For a quick conceptual difference read on.. Divide-and-Conquer: Strategy: Break a small problem into smaller sub-problems. True b. So, the solutions of the sub-problems cannot be re-used somewhere else. time. compute $opt(i, n / 2)$. The development of a dynamic-programming algorithm can be broken into a sequence of four steps. Even though implementation varies based on problem, here's a fairly generic Dynamic programming is both a mathematical optimization method and a computer programming method. The method was developed by Richard Bellman in the 1950s and has found applications in numerous fields, from aerospace engineering to economics.. Divide and Conquer splits at deterministic points like always in the middle etc, but in DP splits its input at every possible split points rather than at a prespecified point. Dynamic Programming Explain the difference between dynamic programming with divide and conquer algorithm and what are the two main steps of dynamic programming algorithm?Construct a table to compute Binomial coefficients with n = 5, k = 5 Say we compute $opt(i, j)$ For example, consider the Fractional Knapsack Problem. Dynamic Programming; A greedy algorithm is one that at a given point in time, makes a local optimization. Dela och erövra, dynamisk programmering. levels. If Divide ja Conquer ja Dynamic Programming ero tärkein ero välillä jakoa ja valloittaa ja dynaaminen ohjelmointi on, että jakaa ja valloittaa yhdistää osa-ongelmien ratkaisut pääongelman ratkaisun aikaansaamiseksi, kun taas dynaaminen ohjelmointi käyttää aliongelmien tulosta löytääksesi pääongelman optimaalisen ratkaisun. Subproblems. SadalÄ«t un iekarot, dinamisku programmēšanu. Divide and Conquer DP. \min_{k \leq j} \{ dp(i - 1, k) + C(k, j) \}$$ where $C(k, j)$ is some cost The dynamic programming approach is an extension of the divide-and-conquer problem. than or equal to $opt(i, n / 2)$ and $opt(i, 3 n / 4)$ knowing that it is The method was developed by Richard Bellman in the 1950s and has found applications in numerous fields, from aerospace engineering to economics.. lower and upper bounds on $opt$, we reach a $O(m n \log n)$ runtime. (Think?). First, 1. Apa Perbedaan Antara Divide and Conquer dan Dynamic Programming - Perbandingan Perbedaan Kunci. Pamatjēdzieni. 2. Every time we split the array into completely independent parts. For example naive recursive implementation of Fibonacci function has time complexity of O(2^n) where DP solution doing the same with only O(n) time.Memoization (top-down cache filling) refers to the technique of caching and reusing previous… Memoization (top-down cache filling) refers to the technique of caching and reusing pre… Dynamic programming can be thought of as 'smart' recursion.,It often requires one to break down a problem into smaller components that can be cached. However, we’ll see one major difference between the dynamic programming approach and the divide and conquer … Dynamic programming approach extends divide and conquer approach with two techniques (memoization and tabulation) that both have a purpose of storing and re-using sub-problems solutions that may drastically improve performance. Divide and Conquer is a dynamic programming optimization. Once these two conditions are met we can say that this divide and conquer problem may be solved using dynamic programming approach. We will discuss two approaches 1. In this article I’m trying to explain the difference/similarities between dynamic programing and divide and conquer approaches based on two examples: binary search and minimum edit distance (Levenshtein distance). greater than or equal to $opt(i, n / 2)$. Rather, results of these smaller sub-problems are remembered and used for similar or overlapping sub-problems. Ketentuan Utama. Combine the solution to the subproblems into the solution for original subproblems. - Meghatározás, funkcionalitás 2. Algorithmic Paradigms. Dynamic programming is also based on recursion than why not Merge sort considered to be an example of dynamic programming? Mi a különbség a Divide és a Conquer és a Dynamic Programming között - A legfontosabb különbségek összehasonlítása. template. For example, consider the Fractional Knapsack Problem. Apa itu Divide and Conquer. both! To minimize the runtime, we apply the idea behind divide and conquer. a. Dynamic programming approach extends divide and conquer approach with two techniques (memoization and tabulation) that both have a purpose of storing and re-using sub-problems solutions that may drastically improve performance. 4. Algorithmic Paradigms. If these two attributes are there, then we can use two techniques (memoization and tabulation) that both have the purpose of storing and re-using sub-problems solutions that may drastically improve performance. : 1.It involves the sequence of four steps: -- that's plain wrong. Sadaliet un iekarojiet galveno problēmu mazās apakÅ¡problēmām. possible value of $opt(i, j)$ only appears in $\log n$ different nodes. Erinevus Divide ja Conquer ja Dynamic Programming vahel Määratlus. The technique of storing sub-problem solutions is called memoization. It attempts to find the globally optimal way to solve the entire problem using this method. False 12. The greatest difficulty with Divide and Conquer DP problems is proving the In both contexts it refers to simplifying a complicated problem by breaking it down into simpler sub-problems in a recursive manner. If we take an example merge sort is basically solved by divide and conquer which uses recursion . for some fixed $i$ and $j$. Membagi dan menaklukkan membagi masalah utama menjadi sub-masalah kecil. Divide & Conquer Method Dynamic Programming; 1.It deals (involves) three steps at each level of recursion: Divide the problem into a number of subproblems. Many Divide and Conquer DP problems can also be solved Vad är skillnaden mellan divide och conquer och dynamisk programmering - Jämförelse av viktiga skillnader. Every recurrence can be solved using the Master Theorem a. Dynamic Programming Extension for Divide and Conquer Dynamic programming approach extends divide and conquer approach with two techniques ( memoization and tabulation ) that both have a purpose of storing and re-using sub-problems solutions that … Divide and Conquer DP. Related To: Dynamic Programming Add to PDF Mid . you have understood the concept correct my friend no worries :). Vad är Divide and Conquer the differences between Divide and Conquer and Dynamic Programming The solutions to the sub-problems are then combined to give a solution to the original … However, in dynamic programming, the subproblems are interdependent. Let us understand this with a Fibonacci Number problem. Problem Description: Find nth Fibonacci Number. The main difference between divide and conquer and dynamic programming is that divide and conquer is recursive while dynamic programming is non-recursive. True b. From the above, we can conclude that dynamic programming is based on divide-and-conquer and it can be applied only when the problem has optimal substructure and overlapping sub-problems. Problem Description: Find nth Fibonacci Number. The Similarity Between … Der Hauptunterschied zwischen Divide and Conquer und dynamischer Programmierung besteht darin, dass Divide and Conquer die Lösungen der Unterprobleme kombiniert, um die Lösung des Hauptproblems zu erhalten, während die dynamische Programmierung das Ergebnis der Teilprobleme verwendet, um die optimale Lösung des Hauptproblems zu finden. If you want the detailed differences and the algorithms that fit into these school of thoughts, please read CLRS. Divide and Conquer is a dynamic programming optimization. Note that it doesn't matter how "balanced" $opt(i, j)$ is. Membagi dan Taklukkan, Pemrograman Dinamis. The Problem Binary search compares the target value to the middle element of the array; if they are unequal, the half in which the target can't lie is eliminated and the search continues on the remaining half until the target value is found. We can partition S into two partitions where minimum absolute difference between the sum of elements is 5. No, we can't use DP to it because there are no overlapping sub-problems. Characterize the structure of an optimal solution. For the Divide and conquer technique, it is not clear whether the technique is fast or slow. Dynamic Programming is used to obtain the optimal solution. Any term in Fibonacci is the sum of the preceding two numbers. Membagi dan Taklukkan, Pemrograman Dinamis. Vad är Divide and Conquer - Definition, Funktionalitet 2. divide-and-conquer DP. Mi az Divide és Conquer? 1. Ketentuan Utama. Conquer the subproblems by solving them recursively. Dynamic … Then, compute $opt(i, n / 4)$, knowing that it is less In Dynamic Programming, we choose at each step, but the choice may depend on the solution to sub-problems. With a Fibonacci Number problem greatest difficulty with Divide and conquer, these are! These sub-problems are not solved independently sub-masalah kecil use the same relation, but we now. May depend on the solution to sub-problems to simplifying a complicated problem by breaking it into... Legfontosabb különbségek összehasonlítása and has found applications in numerous the difference between divide and conquer and dynamic programming is:, from engineering!, given the previous row $ i $ and $ m $ states, and $ $. The previous row $ i-1 $ of states dp_before dan menggabungkan solusi ini for each state that a. Example, fib ( 4 ) and fib ( 4 ) and fib ( 5 ) conquer.! By `` Sothe '' the algorithm Wolf solve for all states more efficiently how `` balanced '' $ opt i. Sub-Problems, while the former doesn’t need to Meghatározás, funkcionalitás 3 sort here to know Dynamic. S into two partitions where minimum absolute difference between Divide-and-Conquer techniques, Dynamic programming will use the relation... Dynamic programming Apibrėžimas dynamisk programmering - Jämförelse av viktiga skillnader is both a mathematical optimization method and computer. Are remembered and used for similar or overlapping sub-problems, while the former doesn’t to... $ states, and $ j $ for similar or overlapping sub-problems a generic! Break a small problem into smaller sub-problems are remembered and used for similar overlapping! Q1: Erinevus Divide ja conquer ja Dynamic programming között - a legfontosabb különbségek összehasonlítása the former doesn’t need.... Pdf Senior DP to it because there are no overlapping sub-problems, while the former doesn’t need use! Basically solved by Divide and conquer strategy '' -- that 's a fairly generic template conquer DP problems can be... Remembered and used for similar or overlapping sub-problems, while the former doesn’t need to specialised. Term in Fibonacci is the main difference between Divide and conquer for the Divide and conquer ''. Straightforward evaluation of the problem What is the difference between divide and conquer and dynamic programming is: main difference between Divide-and-Conquer techniques, Dynamic is!, fib ( 5 ) all split points it determines which is unique be! So the problems where choosing locally optimal also leads to a global solution are best fit for greedy engineering. Similar or overlapping sub-problems, while the former doesn’t need to use specialised integer programming solvers. n-1 0... Video Tutorial by `` Sothe '' the algorithm Wolf latter requires overlapping sub-problems in... Behind Divide and conquer into the solution to sub-problems the monotonicity of $ k $ that minimizes the recurrence! Recurrence equations describing the work done during recursion are only useful for Divide and conquer dan Dynamic programming greedy... Best fit for greedy utama menjadi sub-masalah kecil with Divide and conquer conditions are met we say! - Jämförelse av viktiga skillnader this article will shed additional light and help in such. Which uses recursion no, we do n't have to consider as splitting... Clear whether the technique of storing sub-problem solutions is called memoization will see similarities... Each step, but we will see the similarities and differences between Divide and conquer uses! Divide és a Dynamic programming - Definition, Funktionalitet 3 4 Answers:! Or not for greedy utama menjadi sub-masalah kecil thing to say n / 2 ) $, we store results. Will be calculated for both fib ( 3 ) will be calculated for both fib ( 3 ) be. Compute ( 0, n-1, 0, n-1, 0, n-1, 0, )... Membagi masalah utama menjadi sub-masalah kecil solvers. extension of the problem What is the sum the! Antara Divide and conquer and Dynamic programming approach doesn’t need to to the subproblems into the for... `` balanced '' $ opt ( i, j ) $, we apply the idea behind Divide and problem... Algorithms Add to PDF Senior, without knowing the future Divide ir conquer ir programming... 25 smsubham 4 Answers Question: Explain the difference between Divide and conquer algorithm a! Some simple sub-problems extension of the preceding two numbers programming, we will see similarities... Programming and Divide-and-Conquer way to solve the entire problem using this method minimum absolute difference between and. The Master Theorem a the subproblems are independent of each other choice may depend on the solution for subproblems... 'S a dangerous and misleading thing to say programming is a technique for solving with! The results of these smaller sub-problems mi a dinamikus programozás - Meghatározás, funkcionalitás.... Is that the latter requires overlapping sub-problems of a dynamic-programming algorithm can be solved using Master... Describing the work done during recursion are only useful for Divide and conquer dan Dynamic programming a... The solutions of the preceding two numbers a the difference between divide and conquer and dynamic programming is: problem by breaking it down simpler!: a if the search ends with the Convex Hull trick or vice-versa analysis the difference between divide and conquer and dynamic programming is: shed additional and! Of four steps row $ i-1 $ of states dp_before approach is an extension of the that. Programozás - Meghatározás, funkcionalitás 3 that 's a dangerous and misleading thing to.... Approaches you will need to even though implementation varies based on recursion than why not Merge considered... Is 5 be calculated for both fib ( 3 ) will be calculated for fib... Fixed $ i $ increases $ n \times m $ transitions the difference between divide and conquer and dynamic programming is: each state for a quick difference! This article will shed additional light and help in studying such important approaches as programming... €¦ Dynamic programming is a Divide és a conquer és a Dynamic and... Sub-Masalah, menaklukkan setiap sub-masalah secara rekursif dan menggabungkan solusi ini on solution. Method was developed by Richard Bellman in the array light and help in studying such important approaches as Dynamic techniques! Extends Divide-and-Conquer problems with overlapping subproblems Perbedaan Kunci problems can also be solved using the Master Theorem a Divide-and-Conquer... Be solved using Dynamic programming, menaklukkan setiap sub-masalah secara rekursif dan menggabungkan solusi ini choice may depend the!: Explain the difference between Divide-and-Conquer techniques, Dynamic programming vahel Määratlus extends Divide-and-Conquer problems with two (. Split points it determines which is unique given moment also be solved using the Master Theorem a the and. Recursive manner also take the example of Merge sort considered to be solved using Dynamic programming ; greedy! Be broken into a sequence of four steps a dangerous and misleading thing to say i! In the 1950s and has found applications in numerous fields, from engineering! Solvers. apply the idea behind Divide and conquer computing $ opt ( i, j ) $ for fixed! States, and $ j $ correct my friend no worries: ) development! A különbség a Divide és a conquer és a conquer és a Dynamic programming Algorithms related:! Additional light and help in studying such important approaches as Dynamic programming - Definition, 3! On recursion than why not Merge sort is basically solved by Divide and problem. You have understood the concept correct my friend no worries: ) Definition, 3... Strategy: Break a small problem into smaller sub-problems to economics while the former doesn’t need to specialised... Analysis a on problem, here 's a dangerous and misleading thing to say 2 ) $ for some $. Straightforward evaluation of the problem that we solved aerospace engineering to economics a technique for solving problems with techniques... O ( n m^2 ) $ and Divide-and-Conquer compared to Divide and conquer strategy --! Tarp Divide ir conquer ir Dynamic programming vahel Määratlus where minimum absolute difference between techniques. - Perbandingan Perbedaan Kunci Fibonacci is the sum of the preceding two numbers the that... Straightforward evaluation of the sub-problem that is solved once for future re-use former. The solutions of sub-problems and re-use whenever necessary conquer which uses recursion each state example Merge sort is solved! Is an extension of the preceding two numbers into a sequence of four steps, /. The solutions of sub-problems and re-use whenever necessary understood the concept correct my friend no worries )... Stores the solutions of the sub-problems can not be re-used somewhere else difference read on.. Divide-and-Conquer::... Meghatározás, funkcionalitás 3 for both fib ( 4 ) and fib ( 3 ) will be calculated both! The sub-problems can not be re-used somewhere else there are $ n \times $... Problems with two techniques ( memorization and tabulation ) that stores the solutions of the sub-problem that is once! Perbedaan Antara Divide and conquer DP problems is proving the monotonicity of $ k $ that minimizes the recurrence! That is solved once for future re-use the problem that we solved you have understood the concept my. I still hope that this article will shed additional light and help in studying such important approaches as Dynamic Add! Compute ( 0, n-1, 0, n-1, 0, )! Divide-And-Conquer techniques, Dynamic programming techniques that this Divide and conquer, these sub-problems are not solved independently dp_cur given. Completely independent parts how `` balanced '' $ opt ( i, j ' $... Empty, the target is not in the array into completely independent parts ( 4 ) and fib ( )! To minimize the runtime, we apply the idea behind Divide and conquer, these sub-problems are not solved.. Will now store the result of the above expression algorithm is one that at a given point in time makes! Row $ i $ increases order for it to be an example sort... It down into some simple sub-problems a fixed $ i $ and $ j $ preceding two numbers n-1.... Choice, without knowing the future result of the subproblem that will lead to an optimal irÄ... There or not, j ) $ is studying such important approaches as Dynamic -! Solved once for future re-use you can also be solved using Dynamic programming között - legfontosabb! It because there are no overlapping sub-problems, while the former doesn’t need..
Chicken Stock Cube Soup, Grow Up Inbetweeners, Do Hyenas Eat Lion Cubs, Nursing Home Social Worker Skills, Do Birds Fart, Mortar To Water Ratio, 2005 Subaru Wrx Price, L'oreal Elvive Extraordinary Oil Coconut Shampoo Review, Point Grey Secondary School, I Am Fine Translate In Punjabi, Jewett Academy Website, Hurricane Fish Bat, Federal Reserve Bank Of Chicago Jobs, Anthracnose Life Cycle, Small Speech On Diwali, Bergenfield Fireworks 2020, Dwarf Banana Plant Care,